Download Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument by David Hitchcock, Bart Verheij PDF

By David Hitchcock, Bart Verheij

Within the makes use of of Argument (1958), Stephen Toulmin proposed a version for the structure of arguments: declare, info, warrant, qualifier, rebuttal, backing. for the reason that then, Toulmin’s version has been appropriated, tailored and prolonged by way of researchers in speech communications, philosophy and synthetic intelligence. This ebook assembles the easiest modern mirrored image in those fields, extending or demanding Toulmin’s rules in ways in which make clean contributions to the speculation of analysing and comparing arguments.

Show description

Read or Download Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (Argumentation Library) PDF

Best epistemology books

Information and Knowledge: A Constructive Type-theoretical Approach

This e-book develops a philosophical and logical interpretation of the concept that of data in the formal constitution of optimistic variety thought (CTT), in a fashion concurrent with a various diversity of up to date views at the philosophy of data. It offers a newly formulated and conceptually constructed presentation of the matter of Analyticity, and a brand new fascinating viewpoint at the confident interpretation of data methods.

Gadamer and Ricoeur: Critical Horizons for Contemporary Hermeneutics

Hans-Georg Gadamer and Paul Ricoeur have been of crucial hermeneutical philosophers of the 20 th century. Gadamer single-handedly revived hermeneutics as a philosophical box along with his many essays and his masterpiece, fact and process. Ricoeur famously mediated the Gadamer-Habermas debate and complex his personal hermeneutical philosophy via a couple of books addressing social thought, faith, psychoanalysis and political philosophy.

Ludwig Wittgenstein--a cultural point of view : philosophy in the darkness of this time

Within the preface to his "Philosophical Investigations" Ludwig Wittgenstein expresses pessimism in regards to the tradition of his time and doubts as to if his rules will be understood in this kind of time: 'I lead them to public with uncertain emotions. it's not most unlikely that it may fall to the lot of this paintings, in its poverty and within the darkness of this time, to deliver gentle into one mind or one other - yet, in fact, it isn't likely'.

Extra info for Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (Argumentation Library)

Sample text

130 s toulmin 9. 123 a whitehead 10. 113 j girard 11. 112 j barwise 12. 112 i lakatos 13. 111 m bunge 14. 107 r carnap 15. 99 c hempel 16. 95 h reichenbach 17. 94 n rescher 18. 88 p gardenfors 19. 87 r stalnaker 20. 80 j hintikka 21. 79 p feyerabend 22. 79 n cartwright 23. 77 p suppes 24. 72 a ayer 25. 61 g vonwright 26. 58 m fitting 27. 56 s kleene 28. 50 a church 29. 47 p geach 30. 47 i levi Table 2: Citations for Toulmin and related authors If we rank each author by the total number of citations (1988-2004), for the most popular work of the author (counting only the most common citation forms seen in 2004), then Toulmin does just as well (Table 3).

I will argue that although Toulmin is correct in rejecting mathematical logic as a theory of argument and logical empiricism as the philosophy of science, there is a significant role for metamathematics in the normative foundation of argument. The core is a metamathematical account of truth and entailment based on physical science rather than arithmetic. KEYWORDS: Stephen E. Toulmin; metamathematics; truth; argument; epistemology; entailment; warrant; backing; philosophy of science; inquiry; formal logic 1.

Can we tell? We just have to wait for the outcome. 4. HUME’S KANTIANISM To move on one step, let me offer a re-interpretation of Hume and Kant. I read A Treatise of Human Nature as saying the following: “Oh, so all we have is sensory inputs and Euclidean deductions, is it? Well, let’s see where this gets us”. The answer, of course is: it gets us nowhere. The result is what misguided teachers of philosophy call “Humeanism”: namely, the conclusion that we don’t know anything, and can’t legitimately claim to know anything, and this makes the World unintelligible.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.88 of 5 – based on 45 votes